On Kidapawan

(Aphorism Nos. 201-202)

Because of its heterogeneity, Kidapawan doesn’t have an identity, and the Kidapawanon is constantly trying to create one. This constant drive to create Kidapawan identity is Kidapawan’s identity.

And I do not want simply to write about Kidapawan, I want to write as a Kidapawanon.


In which the author, with archaic language, gives public notice of the cause of this blog’s temporary unavailability, of changes to his literary appellation, and of the implications by these same changes and alterations caused

To my much valued and well beloved Readers, Followers, Stalkers, Haters, and all such pleasant or unpleasant personages that now do read this here blog, Greetings.

Forasmuch as this blog has, for the past few weeks, been rendered inaccessible to you and to the general public, and the motivation thereto being undisclosed prior to such a rendering, I therefore do hereby notify you, good Readers, Followers, Stalkers, and Haters in readership hereto united that this here blog hath been thus rendered inaccessible for the intention of:
– making most desirable changes to this here blog’s appearance;
– observing the usual sabbatical of seclusion for the month of September, to which I have over the years been accustomed; and
– making necessary alterations to several parts hereto in relation to the changes to my nom de plume recently agreed to.

And thereby do I also notify you, good Haters, Stalkers, Followers, and Readers in readership hereto united that henceforth until subsequent alterations are in future agreed to, I shall in writing refer to myself under the appellation of Antonio Galay-David, without my first name of ‘Karlo’ – shared most inconveniently with my good brother Karlo Enrico and granted quite unpleasantly by my most un-illustrious father – and with the double barrel surname including the most honourable maiden name of my rightly obeyed and dearly beloved mother and of her most respectable family, added to give dignity to the lowliness any well informed Kidapawanon would associate to the name of my aforementioned most un-illustrious father’s house. All works written by me shall therefore and henceforth be attributed in publication and for other purposes to the name Antonio Galay-David.

But whereas this change of name has been thus agreed to, those who have been hitherto accustomed to address me as ‘Karlo’ or ‘Karlo David’ nevertheless have no need of altering their accustomed appellation or appellations to me in person or in most pleasant informal writing, as the changes agreed to and hereby made notice of are limited to attribution in publications and for other such purposes. Similarly shall I use my complete name for this here blog, which is in nature, as it always has been, personal, and so shall my gmail address remain karlo.antonio.david@gmail.com. And my Monogram and Signature, in use, please God, since time immemorial, shall most rightly continue to be composed, as it always has been, of my complete initials of KAGD, stylized in the manner accustomed.

In witness whereof do I cause this here post to be thus published, and for this here blog to be again made available to you and to the general public in most loyal readership hereto united. Let this here post be deemed good!


2nd Prize for One Act Play in English, 64th Palanca Awards

2014-09-11 19.22.51 Okay, this was unexpected.

I won 2nd place for One Act Play in English in this year’s Palanca awards. Yes, I’m a Palanca awardee now.

I have never met the judges before, and I doubt any of them know who I am. But I am deeply thankful for the honour. I look forward to more Palancas in the future (I want a medal!)

No, I wasn’t able to attend the award ceremony. Not enough time and money.

Following the official announcement, congratulations from everybody poured in, and I thank them all for their good wishes. Special mention is to be made of actor Bamboo Ranada, who has been a fan of the play since he first read it, of young writer ate Hannah Enanoria, who went out of her way to make a statement on Facebook even though she couldn’t find me there anymore, and of poet Arkay Timonera and ballerina Marya Inocencio, who served to disseminate the news when I tried to keep it as quiet as I could (this blog post was inevitable because of them).

Silliman has also warmly received it. An article on the Weekly Sillimanian, featuring an interview with me, was lead story in one issue, and some MassCom Students interviewed me on a local TV station about it. I will make the article and interview available here when I get it.

My humble old organization in Ateneo de Davao, the Society of Ateneo Literature and English Majors (SALEM), had also announced their congratulations, and I thank them for it.

Palanca Hall of Famer Krip Yuson also mentioned me, among other winners, in his column on Philippine Star, and it was  nice of him to remember me.

Perhaps most warmly, my mother proceeded to call me ‘Palanca awardee’ many days after hearing the news (she was the first to find out, even before I knew it, because she got the official letter in Davao while I was here in Dumaguete).

The play that won, ‘Killing the Issue,’ is my most successful work so far – it got me into Iyas in 2011 (in its original godawful Tagalog version) then to Silliman in 2012 (in its original godawful English version).

I wrote it when I was in third year college, just nineteen, and it was conceived on a jeepney going to school. Inspired by the Maguindanao Massacre, the play nevertheless tries to look at a reality true for all Philippine politics. I shall make it available here on this blog as soon as the Palanca Foundation uploads it online.

After years of slash and burn, it’s finally time to leave it alone.

But ultimate fulfillment for me would be if I hear that my hometown of Kidapawan is proud of me. I am a fan of the poet Rita Gadi, and if I’m not mistaken I’m only the second Palanca awardee the city has produced. But maybe before me, Kidapawan ought to recognize and celebrate her first. Ah, how our love for our hometowns is unrequited.


Sands and Coral Logo

2014-08-22 16.43.01

The logo of Sands and Coral, Silliman University’s literary folio.

First published in 1948, Sands and Coral is arguably the country’s first literary folio (as the story goes, copies of the first issue reached the College Editors Guild of the Philippines Convention being held in Bacolod at the time, and the idea spread to different campuses around the country from there). First conceived by the poet Ricaredo Demetillo, the S&C materialized with the efforts of its first editors, Aida Rivera (now Ford) and Cesar Amigo. The list of S&C‘s editors include the who’s who of Philippine letters, from Myrna Pena-Reyes to Elsa Martinez-Coscolluela, from Rowena Tiempo-Torrevillas to Marjorie Evasco, and it has over the decades featured works by almost every relevant writer in the country’s literature.

The logo, designed by Reuben Canoy, has appeared in almost every issue since the first.


The Poet as Prophet and Punster: A Review of In Samarkand by Cesar Ruiz Aquino

(I just found out that this came out in the Silliman Journal! This feels timely because sir Sawi won this year’s Nick Joaquin Poet of the Year)

The Poet as Prophet and Punster

A Review by Antonio Galay-David
In Samarkand by Cesar Aquino, a collection of poems and verseliterations, illustrates the poet’s development from the lush lyricism of his salad days to the word-obsessed economy of his more erudite later life. But the placement of the newer poems at the beginning of the book and the earlier ones at the end lend the collection a retrogressive movement, with the succinct newer poems “blossoming” into the more ornate eloquence of younger days. This “blossoming,” occurring in reverse of Wilde’s proposed development of wisdom in the decrease of earnestness, is skewered with the gradual decrease of what T.S. Eliot describes as high intellectualism in poetry: the later poems are whimsical but are dense with allusive reference, while as the collection backtracks the allusions diminish but the poems acquire a graver tone. This is such that the first “X-Sight” of the book appears to be a more succinct but more parodic version of the richer “X-Sight” that concludes the collection. Serving as transition between the younger and older poems are the verseliterations – poems crafted by taking lines of prose – which are on their own works of a certain gravitas easily accessible on closed reading but are in fact crafted experimentally, portending perhaps the poet’s departure from his lyricism into the laboratory of words.
But this generalization would not mention the consistencies found throughout the collection, for across time Aquino’s stylistic peculiarities remain constant. For one thing, many of the poems rely on deft execution of solidity of specification. In the early poem “Song” for instance, the oft discussed unrequited love is concretely demonstrated in all its hopelessness with the lines “your smile was the ripple I made/ on your surface of eternal water.” The same concreteness is evident in the later poem “Like the moon,” with the lines “in the gut of craters that you left” demonstrating the emptiness of absence. This also occurs in the violence of language that borders on surrealism reminiscent of Jose Garcia Villa. This is evident in early poems, like “Verb lovely flesh” as well as in later poems like the haiku “Signs of the times.”
Perhaps the most pervading consistency in the collection is the poet’s own voice of erudition, if not that Eliotian high intellectualism in the poem’s intertextuality then in the poems’ collective portending “of what is yet to happen” to quote the introduction by Edith Tiempo.
As mentioned, the poems are often heavy with allusion, revealing there not only the poet’s vast store of knowledge but also his deep connection to the Philippine poetic tradition. The several “Kalisud” poems, for instance, are given a new dimension if the reader is familiar with the allusion (Rowena Torrevillas gives useful commentary on one of the poems, “Kalisud ala Superman”). In his lyricism the poet does not hesitate to cite spiritual references, from the Kabalistic allusion of Adam Kadmon in “Name” to the Indochinese sanctity of the river Chao Phraya in “In the sign.” In less lyrical works the allusion is almost central to the poem, as the case in “Tendril.” The long poem “Eyoter,” a tour de force of allusions and linguistic puns, is so allusive it even throws in the names of the poet’s writer-friends Susan Lara, Krip Yuson and Ricky de Ungria. Aquino also admits to his influences, and Jun Lansang is oft alluded to in the poems as well. But perhaps the verseliterations are the most concrete demonstration of allusion, as at times the very point of the verseliteration is the content of the source prose.
Many of the poems are of an inherently contemplative nature, departing from pure experience and delving into the humanistic – and sometimes sociological – implications of the experience, demonstrating what Edith Tiempo describes as the “Aristotelian Heresy” in the introduction. In “She” for instance the poet imagines the embers of passion burning within the woman even after the act of intercourse (“she retains the fire”). The speculation begins when the poet declares that “she is the fire” – that in woman sex becomes being. The same goes with “X-Sight” (in both versions). The persona begins by describing the strangeness of the addressee’s lack of impact when he tries to recall her. But then it moves on to realizing why: for the trivialities of the flesh do not last in light of the eternal subject, revealed when the persona “runs into” who the addressee really is. The almost occult poetic wisdom of “Song” is described vividly in Wilfredo Pascua Sanchez’ commentary at the book’s end.
A selection of best poems would not be definitive of the collection’s quality and would come out with pronounced heterogeneity. But undoubtedly the best poems are the two “X-Sight”s, “She comes with horns and tail,” “Shock of Recognition,” “Eyoter,” “Idea,” “Plain Blues,” “Song” and “Word without end.” For the verseliterations, “words,” “The hunt for plums,” “the unprintable word” and “the birds.” “She comes with horns and tail” earns recognition for its transforming image of the crescent moon comet as horns and tail. “Shock of recognition” demonstrates that near madness typical in poetic expression. “Eyoter” almost does not make sense but demonstrates the poet’s deft use of puns (“Cesar Aquino in pun y vino”). “Idea,” like “Shock of Recognition,” demonstrates how the fantasy of imagery can be used to express unpronounceable emotions. “Plain blues” gets recognition for its delightful mockery of the formal device of metaphor in its last lines. The stylistic complexity of “Word without end,” demonstrated simply by the fact that the quatrains’ initials are anagrams of “love,” are analyzed more thoroughly in a closed reading by Ralph Semino Galan. Almost all of the verseliterations are excellent, and the above selection is almost arbitrary. But perhaps special mention should be made of “The college sits down,” which is so well crafted it piqued the curiosity of the writer of this review to try Malachi Martin’s “The Final Conclave.”
The eponymous poem, “Samarkand” deserves special mention because it is the most prototypical piece in the collection. Like most of the poems it demonstrates not the immediate experience but the possible implications of the experience, in this case the persona’s hopelessly romantic “stopping for you to catch up forever.” The allusion to the ancient capital of Tamerlane’s Mongol empire is perhaps to mirror another poem about a Mongol Khagan, Coleridge’s Kubla Khan, and the aversion of women described in that poem to Kublai Khan. The allusion is strengthened by the subtle pun “tamarind,” an allusion to Tamerlane.
In Samarkand’s lofty intellectualism comes in both densely allusive lines and in the almost deranged nature of its speculative gravitas. As such it is a daunting collection to read. But the reward of tapping into that “abundance of poetic substance of highest merit” (again taken from the introduction) is worth the effort. In Samarkand demonstrates what makes Cesar Aquino one of the country’s foremost poets.